Jump to content

Let’s. Fucking. Go!


Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, ManUtdRedDevils said:

Currently, all manufacturers qualify for the tax credit until it sells X amount of cars. GM and Tesla have sold enough cars to no longer qualify, but companies like Kia and Hyundai still do.
 

When this new legislature passes, the credit won’t be based on X units sold, but on if the car and battery are made in America. This will impact foreign car brands from qualifying. 

 

I think the car and battery can be produced in US, Mexico, or Canada, not just the US to qualify for the full credit. 

  • Halal 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, marioandsonic said:

 

That's what I've read, yes.  I was think of a Chevy Bolt.  Are you saying that it won't qualify, regardless of when I got it?

 

If you're looking at a Bolt, it's probably a boost, assuming GM doesn't just raise the pricing to match the credits available. It will likely be eligible for $3,750 out the gate (where it's assembled 50%, where the battery materials came from the other 50%).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, marioandsonic said:

 

That's what I've read, yes.  I was think of a Chevy Bolt.  Are you saying that it won't qualify, regardless of when I got it?

In 10 days or so, it will qualify for either for $7,500 or $3,750.  The full credit depends on the battery. GM has yet to comment on which cars qualify for what. 
 

GMAUTHORITY.COM

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, Greatoneshere said:

 

I thought IRA did make the minimum corporate tax rate 15%? I felt like I was reading that was the case after it passed the Senate? I know Sinema got exemptions for her precious private equity firms but not more?

499d1505a7de83dc41e7a1f6affb1ec3
WWW.YAHOO.COM

Sinema was told that her last-minute intervention on the corporate minimum tax would introduce a big loophole in the tax code. She pursued it anyway.
Quote

In the legislation known as the Inflation Reduction Act, Sinema intervened twice over the span of a week in ways that mostly benefited rich investors:

Added a carveout exempting private equity's subsidiaries from the 15% corporate minimum tax (which would have raised $35 billion over a decade)

Removed a provision narrowing the carried interest loophole (which would have raised $14 billion over a decade)

 

The private equity exemption from the corporate minimum tax means any profits generated from smaller companies owned by that sector won't count towards the $1 billion threshold established for large, profitable firms to be taxed. Some experts are beginning to describe it as a new loophole that will be set up in the tax code.

107097758-16594731552022-08-02t203856z_1
WWW.CNBC.COM

Sinema backed the bill after the removal of a provision to narrow the so-called carried interest loophole, a tax benefit that both Biden and Trump opposed.
Quote

Schumer said that another tax piece from the Inflation Reduction Act was taken out in order to secure the deal with Sinema. This one came from a proposal to impose a 15% corporate alternative minimum tax aimed at rich corporations that are accused of skirting their tax obligations. It was projected to raise $313 billion — more than 40% of the bill’s revenue.

While that part of the bill was altered, ”$258 billion of that remains, so the vast majority remains,” Schumer said.

And while the carried interest provision was nixed, Schumer said Democrats added in an excise tax on stock buybacks that will bring in $74 billion. He said that multiple legislators are “excited” about that update.

“I hate stock buybacks. I think they’re one of the most self-serving things corporate America does,” Schumer said. “I’d like to abolish them.”

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, mclumber1 said:

I like the fact that this will likely drive mineral extraction and manufacturing in the United states, both of which create good paying blue collar jobs that don't require a degree.  

You’ll just be crippled by the time you’re 50!

 

(And they’ll only be good paying if they’re union)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, rc0101 said:

Signed my “binding” contract with Rivian today. Still curious how it all works since I don’t think I’m due to receive for another year or so. 

If you aren’t grandfathered in, you should still be able to qualify for $3,750. 
 

12 minutes ago, CitizenVectron said:

While I am not a fan of many of the best (particularly Hyundai and Toyota) brands of EVs not qualifying (and therefore this being a handout to massively inferior American car companies), I am a fan of these types of wartime-level shifts in the economy in an effort to slow climate change.

Really wish it allowed the companies to use of the old credit first and then have to qualify for the new credit.  With less competition, domestic companies will take advantage of the consumer. Maybe a coincidence, Ford just announced a $6k price increase on the Lightening. 

  • Halal 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, ManUtdRedDevils said:

If you aren’t grandfathered in, you should still be able to qualify for $3,750. 
 

Really wish it allowed the companies to use of the old credit first and then have to qualify for the new credit.  With less competition, domestic companies will take advantage of the consumer. Maybe a coincidence, Ford just announced a $6k price increase on the Lightening. 

My understanding is that since I signed the contract that I’m eligible for the full $7,500. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, ManUtdRedDevils said:

Maybe a coincidence, Ford just announced a $6k price increase on the Lightening. 


Are people not familiar with what subsidies do?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, sblfilms said:


That is what subsidies do. The supply didn’t change, just the number of dollars chasing it

The point is to drive supply change (to non China sources of materials for battery based cars and also from ICE engines) in the long term. If there is free money for doing xyz then the market will move to that end, especially in a somewhat competitive market

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

0x0.jpg?format=jpg&width=1200
WWW.GOOGLE.COM

Democrats may be taking a victory lap, but let’s be straight, the climate provisions of the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) pose no real threat to the U.S. oil and gas industry. The industry has Sen. Manchin, whose...
Quote

An abrupt transition could further hammer the fragile economy, prompting energy prices to spike even higher in a manner that parts of the world – notably Europe – are already experiencing.

But the IRA should allow domestic oil and gas companies to transition at a reasonable pace, providing space for continued investment in oil and natural gas supply while encouraging the industry to advance decarbonization plans over time. It takes a “more now, less tomorrow” approach to oil and gas – a policy that is gaining more traction around the world in the aftermath of the Ukraine crisis.

 

Big Oil, the major oil companies like ExxonMobil and Chevron, did not make a big stink about the IRA, and that speaks volumes.

That’s because components of the legislation will subsidize the major oil companies’ decarbonization, or “net-zero” emissions programs, by pumping money into nascent technologies like carbon capture and storage (CCS), hydrogen, and advanced biofuels, where they have placed the biggest bets in the energy transition.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, CitizenVectron said:

While I am not a fan of many of the best (particularly Hyundai and Toyota) brands of EVs not qualifying (and therefore this being a handout to massively inferior American car companies), I am a fan of these types of wartime-level shifts in the economy in an effort to slow climate change.


Lol Toyota’s only fully EV car on the market just got recalled because their tires are falling off. Easy with the anti American bias ya hosier.

  • Haha 1
  • True 2
  • Halal 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Joe said:


Lol Toyota’s only fully EV car on the market just got recalled because their tires are falling off the car. Easy with the anti American bias ya hosier.

How else do you expect to stop the car when Toyota’s brake system fails?  Toyota is thinking outside the box. I commend them!

  • True 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, CitizenVectron said:

 

They have the best PHEVs on the market for the average consumer! 


We’re talking about real EVs, none of that hybrid bs. The zb4x was totally underwhelming compared to the Mach e and now it isn’t even being sold anymore due to a massive flaw in its design!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/11/2022 at 10:59 AM, CitizenVectron said:
UMOXHJBOLRIE7FWZKMONT7TCB4.jpg
WWW.THEGLOBEANDMAIL.COM

An earlier version of the bill would likely have put the U.S. in compliance with a key piece of a global tax deal announced by Canada and more than 130 OECD countries

 

 

tl;dr: OECD made a deal last year for all members to raise corporate tax rates to a global standard. IRA/BBB would have done this (15% rate), but it was removed to get Sinema's support, etc. As a result of the US breaking its part of the deal, Canada will go ahead and start taxing American companies with a 3% DST (digital sales tax) for online revenue generated within Canada as of 2024. However, the tax will be retroactive to all digital sales starting from 2022. This will likely set off some kind of online trade war.

Won't be much of a war. Canadian government will complain, American government will say "haha fuck you", and that will be the end of it. Canada will try to take their 3%, so companies will raise their prices 5% or more on goods crossing the border, or threaten just not to do business in Canada. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BloodyHell said:

Won't be much of a war. Canadian government will complain, American government will say "haha fuck you", and that will be the end of it. Canada will try to take their 3%, so companies will raise their prices 5% or more on goods crossing the border, or threaten just not to do business in Canada. 

 

 

 

Not sure if you paid attention to the last trade war...but the US didn't do so well. Obviously both sides suffer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...