Jump to content

UPDATE - Liberals win minority government, but everyone's a loser. | Canada Votes |OT| - 44th Federal Election - Sept 20, 2021


Recommended Posts

12 hours ago, CitizenVectron said:

Interesting little thread on why maybe the IVR pollsters show a bigger CPC lead than online or phone pollsters:

 

 

This could have merit, making the CPC lead bigger than it is...but at the same time, it also shows that CPC enthusiasm is higher, which is a big advantage on election day.

 

IMO, the direction of the polls is probably more accurate than their absolute numbers.  I would guess that they will be more accurate after Labour Day, when people are more likely to not be on vacation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

 

 

We're now in a world where supposedly credible people are turning into conspiracy theorists who believe that the current CPC slogan is a dog-whistle for Neo-Nazis.  (For those who think he was joking, he has doubled-down on this.)

David Fisman is the UofT professor that recently resigned from the Ontario Science Table because he felt they were ignoring his Covid modelling, and received national media attention.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, b_m_b_m_b_m said:

If you're in political communications it should absolutely be in your job to make sure you're not casually using, even innocently or incidentally, well known hate tropes and phrases.

No.  I think we should live in a world where we don't have conspiracy theorists that try and link centrist political parties to racist hate groups from other countries.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, AbsolutSurgen said:

No.  I think we should live in a world where we don't have conspiracy theorists that try and link centrist political parties to racist hate groups from other countries.

Or maybe someone in political communications should have a better understanding of hate rhetoric and that you can't repurpose it for not hateful aims. That should be part of their job, hell that is their job. I'm not even accusing them of doing this purposefully but just ignoring the international historical context of certain phrases in a shared language is just so, so stupid. Hell, political rhetoric is often shared between us anglo countries, so you need to be aware at a surface level of what is going on!

 

Again, this was done by a paid political operative and not some idiot online. They should know better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, AbsolutSurgen said:

 

 

 

 

While I do believe the direction of that poll, it is worth keeping in mind two things:

  • Angus Reid has a very strong pro-CPC house effect (just as strong as IRG's pro-LPC house effect). No one else has Trudeau that underwater in approval (usually around 0 to -5)
  • Bryan Breguet has his own anti-LPC bias. You should check out some of his comments on twitter from a few months ago. He...does not like the current government. He really shouldn't be running an ostensibly neutral poll aggregator/predictor while being so open about his own beliefs, it definitely taints his commentary on the current polling. He's kind of like the Nate Silver of Canadian politics (only less intelligent/knowledgeable—stick to your analysis and leave the commentary out)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, CitizenVectron said:

 

While I do believe the direction of that poll, it is worth keeping in mind two things:

  • Angus Reid has a very strong pro-CPC house effect (just as strong as IRG's pro-LPC house effect). No one else has Trudeau that underwater in approval (usually around 0 to -5)
  • Bryan Breguet has his own anti-LPC bias. You should check out some of his comments on twitter from a few months ago. He...does not like the current government. He really shouldn't be running an ostensibly neutral poll aggregator/predictor while being so open about his own beliefs, it definitely taints his commentary on the current polling. He's kind of like the Nate Silver of Canadian politics (only less intelligent/knowledgeable—stick to your analysis and leave the commentary out)

They're all different perspectives that help us piece together a total picture. 

Frank Graves is the most outwardly biased person in the industry that I have seen -- I still post data from him.

For Good measure:

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, AbsolutSurgen said:

 

Edit: Posted too early

 

 

 

This will only explain why the IVR polling results have changed -- this disconnect between IVR and online may remain unanswered.

 

I don't understand how anybody could look at 1-3 & 7 and think O'Toole would have done better. 4-6 I can see someone might see the CPC better on but that comes down to persona/party bias. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

I expect we'll see some tightening, and then another swing in some direct after the debates.

 

Oh, also, there are apparently three French debates/interviews planned, and only one in English. The English networks in Canada really suck at organizing debates. There needs to be one with just Trudeau, O'Toole, and Singh, with maybe Blanchet for the final fifteen minutes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, chakoo said:

 

I don't understand how anybody could look at 1-3 & 7 and think O'Toole would have done better. 4-6 I can see someone might see the CPC better on but that comes down to persona/party bias. 

 

Trudeau tried to stop a vote calling the Uhghur (sp?) Muslim genocide a genocide, and you believe he'd be better at standing up for Canada and against other countries? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, BloodyHell said:

Trudeau tried to stop a vote calling the Uhghur (sp?) Muslim genocide a genocide, and you believe he'd be better at standing up for Canada and against other countries? 

 

He didn't stop it, he and his cabinet just did not participate. If you think the CPC in power would have acted differently then you're naive. Harper and the CPC had no issue selling out Canada to China just the same.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, chakoo said:

 

I don't understand how anybody could look at 1-3 & 7 and think O'Toole would have done better. 4-6 I can see someone might see the CPC better on but that comes down to persona/party bias. 

 

Everyone's views are down to personal bias. 

I personally think that Singh do a significantly better job tackling almost any issue than Trudeau, and O'Toole would do a better job.  [It mostly speaks to how low my personal opinion is of Trudeau is ATM.]

12 hours ago, CitizenVectron said:

 

 

I expect we'll see some tightening, and then another swing in some direct after the debates.

 

Oh, also, there are apparently three French debates/interviews planned, and only one in English. The English networks in Canada really suck at organizing debates. There needs to be one with just Trudeau, O'Toole, and Singh, with maybe Blanchet for the final fifteen minutes.

I won't try and predict where the polls will go, not how they will translate into ACTUAL popular vote (and seat projections).  They are all over the place at the moment.

 

IMHO, one debate is enough.  And to be honest, IMHO including the fringe parties at all is completely unnecessary.  The debates used to be more useful when they were actually debates, rather than the current theatre of avoiding most questions and returning to prepared talking points.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, AbsolutSurgen said:

Everyone's views are down to personal bias. 

I personally think that Singh do a significantly better job tackling almost any issue than Trudeau, and O'Toole would do a better job.  [It mostly speaks to how low my personal opinion is of Trudeau is ATM.]

I won't try and predict where the polls will go, not how they will translate into ACTUAL popular vote (and seat projections).  They are all over the place at the moment.

 

I know personal bias will play a large roll in it but objectively speaking some of those there is no basis for reality in that opinion (like climate change). There are some of those I do think Singh would do a better job on (4, 6 & 7) but there is no guarantee on that either (BC is still horrible for housing).

 

I don't actually dislike Singh, I was for him during the leadership race. I just have a dislike of him saying some of the dumbest things (like saying Trump was right on something that he was horribly wrong on) when trying to 1up on JT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, chakoo said:

 

I know personal bias will play a large roll in iit but objectively speaking some of those there is no basis for reality in that opinion (like climate change). There are some of those I do think Singh would do a better job on (4, 6 & 7) but there is no guarantee on that either (BC is still horrible for housing).

 

I don't actually dislike Singh, I was for him during the leadership race. I just have a dislike of him saying some of the dumbest things (like saying Trump was right on something that he was horribly wrong on) when trying to 1up on JT.

There is lots of different opinions on what a good job looks like on climate change.  Your opinion on where it should go is probably different than mine.  And both of our opinions are probably different than where the average Albertan thinks it should go.  There is really no objective way to measure it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Liberal candidate allowed to run for re-election despite past claims of inappropriate behaviour | CBC News

Quote

The Liberal Party has given southwestern Ontario candidate Raj Saini the green light to seek re-election for his third term as an MP despite a series of allegations of inappropriate behaviour toward young female staffers that spanned his six years in office, CBC News has learned. 

Seven sources with knowledge of the claims described four different cases where Saini allegedly made unwanted sexual advances or inappropriate comments. Saini said he has never acted inappropriately toward staff. 

A former senior staffer who filed a Canadian Human Rights Commission complaint against Saini last year alleging unwelcome advances and harassing behaviour said it's upsetting the party is allowing Saini to campaign again under the Liberal banner in Kitchener Centre. The staffer said her experience in Saini's office contributed to her mental distress, and she eventually tried to take her own life in his office in March 2020.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...