Jump to content

David Cage and Quantic Dream appear to have had a rough couple of days in court


Recommended Posts

For those who are unaware, David Cage and Quantic Dream are suing two French newspapers (Le Monde and Mediapart) over stories about the toxic workplace environment at the studio that they claim are defamatory in nature.  Last week, the case was finally heard in a Paris court and let's just say that things don't appear to have gone particularly well for Cage & Co.

 

Here's a translation of the an article in French that described the proceedings:

 

Quote

"I'm not under oath, so can I lie?" - Guillaume de Fondaumière

 

On May 27 and 28, 2021, a trial was held in the Paris court between Quantic Dream and the newspapers Le Monde and Mediapart. The video game studio is suing the two newspapers for defamation for articles that reveal

- the existence and distribution within Quantic Dream of racist, homophobic, transphobic and Nazi photomontages.
- a practice of social fraud set up as a system
- and more generally a toxic corporate culture

 

During these two days of trial, the leaders of Quantic Dream competed with arrogance and amateurism. They came to attack the newspapers, but the trial seems to have turned against them as they struggle to defend their decency and dignity.

 

So, which moments should we remember from these two days of grotesque trial?

 

David Cage stammering, in tears, exclaiming "you interfere in my business! "before leaving the courtroom, fleeing from the defense lawyers' plea. It is obvious that it was difficult for him to talk about honor when mentioned a list of remarks he had made in public: "anyway, in my games, all women are whores", "in the open space, there is a lack of tits" or "at Quantic Dream, we don't make games for fags".

 

In the case of social fraud, Quantic Dream proudly displayed documents concerning the dismissal of an employee, supposedly showing the good faith of the company. The defense lawyers thank Quantic Dream, because after a quick examination, the documents reveal irregularities implying an illegal dismissal.

 

Another terrible moment is when we see a dozen or so identical letters of dismissal, all copy/paste, with only the name of the employee changing, and always with the same mention of "differences of opinion with the management", including in the case of GUILLAUME DE FONDAUMIERE's self dismissal. He obviously had difficulty following his own directives.

 

Questioned on this subject, the CEO of Quantic Dream, at the end of his arguments, asked the magistrates, eye to eye, "but I'm not under oath, so can I lie?" before making a series of dubious allegations, and evoking a company in serious jeopardy (without however being able to provide any proof of any harm).

 

The gesticulations of the beleaguered CEO might make one smile, if they did not underline the existence of a system of social fraud intended to evade social contributions.

 

The witnesses called by Quantic Dream, all current or former employees of the company, do not fare any better. Praising so much the virtues of the company, they pushed a judge to ask them to "stop with the elements of language".

 

The staff representatives, when asked about the actions taken following the publication of the articles, mentioned "informal talks" without being able to cite more concrete actions.

 

The person in charge of harassment matters at the CSE, for her part, believes that there is no harassment in the company since she has never received a message on the subject.

 

And everyone seems to be discovering parts of the case, from the toxic nature of the photomontages to the company's institutional fraud practices.

 

For Solidaires Informatique, beyond the ridiculousness of seeing two bosses stammering when they have to explain their dubious methods, this trial is important, because it dismantles part of the company's vast strategy of rewriting the facts, an agglomeration of intimidation, provocation, false communications and legal proceedings.

 

The verdict will be given on July 8.

 

While waiting for this date, we renew our call for solidarity with the former employees who denounced these practices, whom Edwy Plenel congratulated for their courage and described as "whistleblowers".

 

These people are also subject to judicial repression by the studio Quantic Dream. Some of them are in financial difficulties, without a job or facing important legal fees.

 

I may not be a lawyer, but I'm pretty sure that asking the judge(s) if it's totally cool to lie because you're not under oath is probably not a particularly wise course of action.

 

Oh, and one more note: Le Monde is essentially the French equivalent of the New York Times or the Washington Post so needless to say, I'm pretty sure that David and whatever law firm is representing him and QD are significantly overmatched.

  • Haha 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/2/2021 at 7:50 AM, Ghost_MH said:

I thought this was a bad translation or something, but nope. He really did ask the judge if he could lie and that is the most amazing question ever.

The shitty writing in his games suddenly makes sense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Xbob42 said:

The shitty writing in his games suddenly makes sense. 

 

I played Fahrenheit back when it came out and loved the first half...and then you Dragon Ball Z fight the Internet and I swore I'd never touch another one of his games. So far it doesn't seem like I made a bad choice.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Ghost_MH said:

 

I played Fahrenheit back when it came out and loved the first half...and then you Dragon Ball Z fight the Internet and I swore I'd never touch another one of his games. So far it doesn't seem like I made a bad choice.

You're smarter than me... I had the same experience with Farenheit and didn't learn my lesson and suffered through Heavy rain. That was it for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ghost_MH said:

 

I played Fahrenheit back when it came out and loved the first half...and then you Dragon Ball Z fight the Internet and I swore I'd never touch another one of his games. So far it doesn't seem like I made a bad choice.

 

Not to mention the awkward necrophilia scene.

 

But unlike you I haven't played a game of his since.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...