Jump to content

TomCat

Members
  • Content Count

    13,815
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

250 Excellent

About TomCat

  • Rank
    Admiral X
  • Birthday April 12

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. No games No money to be made. MS dropped the ball this gen Game Wise. New Hardware does no good if you dont have games to drive the hardware. Good thing they Acquired alot of new Studios. If they dont fix the AAA games drought their hardware has no chance
  2. LOL I remember reading we removed all of our nukes during the coupe attempt
  3. guess you didnt read the link i provided hell its in the quote I posted
  4. GPU was hampered by an underperforming cpu. that wont be the case with the new systems. i expect the gpu in scarlett to have twice the performance of the 1xgpu putting it in the 12-14 terraflop range
  5. ➤ PC Games Hardware: Does the already mentioned statement 4x relate to the performance of the complete console? Phil Spencer: No, that's a pure CPU statement. It would also be a little too simplistic to refer to the whole system, as much as I would like to, because so many components flow into it. Take the Xbox One X: In its development, the memory bandwidth was the bottleneck. It had to be big enough to provide content to the GPU without idle time. We could have brought the console to market a year earlier, but we waited another year to get all 6 of the GPU's TFLOPS up and running. Our primary goal with Scarlett was to improve the graphics capabilities and GPU of the console. Primarily because another goal was to integrate a CPU into the system that can compete with the GPU. Unlike PCs, consoles have historically been "arm-presses" with a strong arm - the GPU - and a weak arm - the CPU, which does nothing other than change frames calculated by the GPU as fast as possible, often with only a maximum of 30 fps. Our primary goal with Scarlett was to improve the graphics capabilities and GPU of the console. Now we are talking about 120 Hertz or variable refresh rates. Because if the timing of the game loop - the core routines of a game - corresponds to the refresh rate, this reduces the input latency and thus ensures a smooth gaming experience. And that depends largely on the CPU and memory bandwidth. That's why you have to see a statement like "Scarlett is x times faster than Xbox One X" a bit more differentiated. Once again I was right 4x the power is only refering to the cpu he also confirmed that the cpu in the 1x was the main reason they coulnt do 60fps like i said https://www.pcgameshardware.de/Xbox-Next-Scarlett-Konsolen-268616/Specials/Phil-Spencer-Das-Mega-Interview-1293543/amp/
  6. I'm trying to find it now but I watched the interview at work so it not marked on my home pc history
  7. phil has said no midgen refresh this system will be strong enough that it wont need one
  8. You are probably right but right now I'm of the belief that ps5 is using navi10 and Xbox will use navi 20. I think xbox is using navi 20 because they said they will have HARDWARE raytracing. According to amd's roadmap you only get that with the full rdna navi 20 the Navi 10 will use software raytracing
  9. Very possible the kits are based on the now defunked lockhart and not the Anaconda. Oh my the Crow that will be eaten. Me myself I like to listen to the people making the systems. MS execs have said that they are aiming to have the most powerful machine. They cant declare its the most powerful until they see actual specs from sony but they have a damn good idea.
  10. It will be hard as hell for them to sink a carrier. My navy is well versed in preventing thier ships from sinking after attack. I anticipate a big missle attack on Irans Refineries so they cant produce any oil to export
×
×
  • Create New...