Jump to content

Algebra Returns to San Francisco 8th Grade, San Francisco backs the Blue 👮


Recommended Posts

That's not the only thing that San Franciscans brought back:

 

City of peace and love votes for drug screening and more police surveillance

 

Quote

 

The liberal bastion of San Francisco pivoted rightward in Tuesday’s election as voters responded to ongoing drug, homelessness and crime crises by approving policies that bolster police and require drug-screening for welfare recipients.

 

The results represent a major victory for embattled Mayor London Breed, a moderate Democrat who faces a tough fight for a second full term in November. She hitched her political future to a slate of three ballot measures that aim to move a city struggling with its slow post-pandemic recovery in a strikingly more conservative direction.

 

Voters approved all three of her measures on Tuesday, including her proposal to screen and mandate addiction treatment for people receiving county welfare.

 

 

  • Guillotine 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • SuperSpreader changed the title to Algebra Returns to San Francisco 8th Grade, San Francisco backs the Blue 👮
7 hours ago, mclumber1 said:

Who's bright idea was it that getting rid of algebra would help with equity?  lmao

 

Every child left behind

 

Not Funny Drums GIF by Martin Almgren

 

San Francisco loves Muslims so much they banned Algebra

 

Joke Shade GIF by Desus & Mero

 

San Francisco plans to fix its high cost of living by banning math

 

Drums GIF by Moncho

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All the policy did was move algebra 1 from 8th grade optional to a 9th grade class. The results were mixed in terms of meeting its goals. Yall are boomering the topic 

 

WWW.EDWEEK.ORG

The policy change improved access to some courses. But racial inequities at the most advanced levels of math remain largely unchanged.

 

  • Halal 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, b_m_b_m_b_m said:

All the policy did was move algebra 1 from 8th grade optional to a 9th grade class. The results were mixed in terms of meeting its goals. Yall are boomering the topic 

 

WWW.EDWEEK.ORG

The policy change improved access to some courses. But racial inequities at the most advanced levels of math remain largely unchanged.

 

 

But how does lowering the bar help anyone?  I still think it was shortsighted for us as society to replace equality with equity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, mclumber1 said:

 

But how does lowering the bar help anyone?  I still think it was shortsighted for us as society to replace equality with equity.

How was the bar lowered? They kept kids on a common math track, and the rates of kids taking advanced math either went marginally up for some groups or stayed roughly the same. There wasn’t an apparent regression. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, b_m_b_m_b_m said:

How was the bar lowered? They kept kids on a common math track, and the rates of kids taking advanced math either went marginally up for some groups or stayed roughly the same. There wasn’t an apparent regression. 

 

Reading the article you posted, the policy initially caused drops in enrollment in AP math classes because the students who would have taken algebra 1 in 86th grade now got jammed up on taking the prereqs for the AP classes. It does say this eventually got fixed to some extent by combining algebra 2 and precalc into a single "compression course", but it still causes problems because a lot of universities don't recognize the compression course as fulfilling precalc, so students put through the SF system then have to waste a semester of college taking precalc.

 

Quote

Some critics of the district’s policy, including STEM professors from several California universities, have claimed that the district’s precalculus compression course doesn’t provide students the same preparation for higher-level classes that a traditional precalculus course would offer. (The University of California system categorizes the compression course as an Algebra 2 course, and it doesn’t exempt students from precalculus prerequisites in state colleges.)

 

The end of the article also discusses how the policy change didn't actually fix any equity gaps in who was taking AP classes, which was supposed to be the whole point of the policy in the first place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, BasemntDweller2 said:

 

 

Curious as to why? Doesn't bother me either way, I don't live there. Im sure its a meager amount of money. 

It’s the equivalent of cutting off healthcare to someone with a chronic health condition. Addiction has many contributing factors and fiends are gonna fiend, but cutting off a path to recovery ensures they stay fiends.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Jason said:

 

Reading the article you posted, the policy initially caused drops in enrollment in AP math classes because the students who would have taken algebra 1 in 86th grade now got jammed up on taking the prereqs for the AP classes. It does say this eventually got fixed to some extent by combining algebra 2 and precalc into a single "compression course", but it still causes problems because a lot of universities don't recognize the compression course as fulfilling precalc, so students put through the SF system then have to waste a semester of college taking precalc.

 

 

The end of the article also discusses how the policy change didn't actually fix any equity gaps in who was taking AP classes, which was supposed to be the whole point of the policy in the first place.

If lowering the bar means an unintended consequence happens, which was then corrected or attempted to be corrected, then every experiment can be labeled as lowering the bar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, TUFKAK said:

It’s the equivalent of cutting off healthcare to someone with a chronic health condition. Addiction has many contributing factors and fiends are gonna fiend, but cutting off a path to recovery ensures they stay fiends.

 

Not to mention the wasted money on drug test just to find out its only a very small percentage of people who will  test positive. This has been proven time and time again in other states. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...