Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0

GTX 670 vs GTX 680 vs HD7870

28 posts in this topic

Posted · Report post

I'm kinda kicking around the idea of an upgrade, since I mentioned it and a co-worker is interested in buying my old parts. I'm looking at the different options for video cards and I'm looking at the 3 mentioned in the title (GTX 670 vs GTX 680 vs HD7870).

How do they stack up in terms of bang for your buck, etc...?

I'm currently running a HD5870. I have absolutely no brand bias and have had good cards from both NVDIA and ATI/AMD. I wouldn't mind going back and playing Batman AC with PhysX turned on, but I'm not sure that's worth the extra price that the 670/680 are going for when compared to the 7870s.

Would like thoughts and suggestions.

Thanks.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

660 ti is good money but if I had a choice I'd get a 670. No brand bias here I have a 6950 right now

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

If $400 is your budget, I'd just get a 670 with a nice cooler. Sometimes you can get 7970's for $400 or less but most of the time it's reference cooler. If you find a 7970 with an aftermarket cooler for around $400, I think I'd give it the nod over a 670.

7870 is not worth considering when the 7950 is often only $20 more.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Go with the 670

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

660 ti is good money but if I had a choice I'd get a 670. No brand bias here I have a 6950 right now

If Kotaku is to be believed, stop laughing, the gain from a 660 to a 680 is so negligible that buying a 680 would be akin to flushing your money down a toilet. And Im 100% biased as I purchases a 660ti today to replace by aging 69501GB.

original.jpg

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Ok, here's some food for thought.

Here is my buddy's EVGA 670 at default clocks:http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/4165175

Versus my Gigabyte 660ti OC: http://www.3dmark.com/3dm11/4166322

The 660ti is no joke, I would never buy a 670 or 680 now that I'd used this card.

Oh, and the Gigabyte Windforce cards are absolutely amazing. I haven't seen it break 65C and the fan is dead silent.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

LOL @ judging cards off of 3Dmark scores, especially for different systems.

Also the Resolution is quite crap. Run it at least at 1080p, as the higher amount of ram may make a larger difference when you up the Resolution (although 1080p is still a relatively low resolution for these cards ram intensive wise).

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Heres a much more respectable chart.

Batman%201920.png

Average%20Perf.png

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

So is a 6950-1gb to 660ti a waste of money?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

So is a 6950-1gb to 660ti a waste of money?

It's not as big of a leap as you were probably expecting; but it's still quite a jump in some games. Perhaps in some situations the 1GB of the 6950 was a problem whereas that problem is now alleviated with the 2GB in the 660ti.

Here is a table comparing 6950 and 660 ti:

http://www.anandtech.com/bench/Product/510?vs=647

Crysis: not much improvement

Metro 2033: some improvement

Dirt3: quite a bit

A few other titles: quite a bit

BF3: quite a bit (likely due to AA because 6xxx and older boards get killed with MSAA on in BF3)

And 3dmark sucks as a benchmark tool when you're looking at gaming performance. Here is 660ti vs 670 in various games:

http://www.anandtech.com/bench/Product/598?vs=647

It's a pretty solid step up going with the 670; especially when you consider the performance/watt after you look at the load power consumption (which is pretty much the same as the 660ti). The difference in performance, of course, is even great when you replace the 670 with a 680.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

So if you were upgrading from a 6950 2gb, you would be best to go with a 670? Or hold out for 680?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

I got a 680 for $350, used. It's a semi-unnecessary upgrade from a 580, just wanted that extra "umph" with some DoF/ENB Skyrim mods :P... If you're interested I'd be willing to offer you my 580 for a very reasonable price (never OC'd it either btw), I'm thinking $230-ish but I'm willing to negotiate a bit, I'm cool with paypal btw. The only catch is that I'm still waiting for the 680 to ship and will need to have it at least on it's way before sending the 580.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

It's not as big of a leap as you were probably expecting; but it's still quite a jump in some games. Perhaps in some situations the 1GB of the 6950 was a problem whereas that problem is now alleviated with the 2GB in the 660ti.

Here is a table comparing 6950 and 660 ti:

http://www.anandtech...duct/510?vs=647

Crysis: not much improvement

Metro 2033: some improvement

Dirt3: quite a bit

A few other titles: quite a bit

BF3: quite a bit (likely due to AA because 6xxx and older boards get killed with MSAA on in BF3)

And 3dmark sucks as a benchmark tool when you're looking at gaming performance. Here is 660ti vs 670 in various games:

http://www.anandtech...duct/598?vs=647

It's a pretty solid step up going with the 670; especially when you consider the performance/watt after you look at the load power consumption (which is pretty much the same as the 660ti). The difference in performance, of course, is even great when you replace the 670 with a 680.

Hmmm, starting to regret my decision a bit. May ship the 660ti back, it wont be here until tomorrow, and go with another card. Or ride out the 6950 awhile longer. It really only chokes on Arkham City DX11, Metro 2033, Skyrim mods and Dolphin in 1080p maxed. For 300 bucks I want a really decent speed bump.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

if you're going for the bang for your buck, i'd vote for the HD 7950 if you can get it for around $300-325.

7950 > 660 Ti when OC'd and it does better with AA and high resolutions. Plus the compute performance is a lot greater. Not sure how that will play in the future, but just something to think about.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

LOL @ the chart using 1024x600. The bottom line is the resolution you are playing at. The 680s performance is more noticed at higher than 1080. Also, those charts love to compare an OC 660ti to stock 670 and 680. Do people seem to forget the 680 OCs as well?

If you play at 1920x1080 or lower, the 660ti is enough. If you game at 6060x1080 like me, the 660 is nowhere near enough power. A single 680 classified only nets me 40fps on ultra at that resolution. A 660 would crawl.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

he's talking about a best bang for your buck deal though, not a best overall thing. a 680 is automatically out of the equations based on this. it's a great card, we all know that, but the 7950 is the best bang for your buck now that it will be lowered to $320 (google radeon price cuts).

if we were talking about no $ restrictions, i'd roll with the 7970 GHZ edition as the best single GPU solution currently available for uber high rez gamers

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

he's talking about a best bang for your buck deal though, not a best overall thing. a 680 is automatically out of the equations based on this.

7950 or 670 will give you best performance/future proof for the price. The memory bandwidth on the 660ti scares me. Again, what resolution is he playing at?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

Hmmm, starting to regret my decision a bit. May ship the 660ti back, it wont be here until tomorrow, and go with another card. Or ride out the 6950 awhile longer. It really only chokes on Arkham City DX11, Metro 2033, Skyrim mods and Dolphin in 1080p maxed. For 300 bucks I want a really decent speed bump.

I have a 6950 as well (but I flashed to 6970). To me, no GTX 6xx or Radeon 79xx board provides a significant increase in performance to warrant the purchase price.

Remember, you can still sell the 6950 1GB for $150. It's a good board.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

So I have the 660ti unopened sitting at home. Probably shipping it back but heres my full setup to get everyone's opinion.

-HTPC 1080p max res

-Currently have...

i5 2400 running @ 3.9, 8 GB, 6950-1GB(newer version you cant flash to 6970)

I can run most games just fine obviously, 6950 only chokes when pushing it in Dolphin(AA/AF maxed at 1080p), Skyrim(with lots of graphic mods) and a few games like Metro and Arkham City DX 11.

So given my setup I'm feeling the 660ti is probably too small an upgrade for me to feel it?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted · Report post

The extra VRAM would smooth out Skyrim. You probably wouldn't see much difference in Metro. You could run PhysX In Arkham City, which IMO significantly adds a lot to the game (but your performance will go down). Can't say what would happen in Dolphin.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0