Outrage as Egypt plans "farewell intercourse" law
#1
Posted 26 April 2012 - 10:59 AM
The controversial new law is part of a raft of measures being introduced by the Islamist-dominated parliament.
It will also see the minimum age of marriage lowered to 14 and the ridding of women's rights of getting education and employment.
Egypt's National Council for Women is campaigning against the changes, saying that 'marginalising and undermining the status of women would negatively affect the country's human development'.
Dr Mervat al-Talawi, head of the NCW, wrote to the Egyptian People’s Assembly Speaker Dr Saad al-Katatni addressing her concerns.
Egyptian journalist Amro Abdul Samea reported in the al-Ahram newspaper that Talawi complained about the legislations which are being introduced under 'alleged religious interpretations'.
The subject of a husband having sex with his dead wife arose in May 2011 when Moroccan cleric Zamzami Abdul Bari said marriage remains valid even after death.
He also said that women have the right to have sex with her dead husband, alarabiya.net reported.
It seems the topic, which has sparked outrage, has now been picked up on by Egypt's politicians.
TV anchor Jaber al-Qarmouty slammed the notion of letting a husband have sex with his wife after her death under the so-called 'Farewell Intercourse' draft law.
He said: 'This is very serious. Could the panel that will draft the Egyptian constitution possibly discuss such issues? Did Abdul Samea see by his own eyes the text of the message sent by Talawi to Katatni?
'This is unbelievable. It is a catastrophe to give the husband such a right! Has the Islamic trend reached that far? Is there really a draft law in this regard? Are there people thinking in this manner?'
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I really wish I could come up with a good joke here...
-- Thrall, Warcraft series
#2
Posted 26 April 2012 - 11:04 AM
#3
Posted 26 April 2012 - 11:05 AM
#4
Posted 26 April 2012 - 11:05 AM
#5
Posted 26 April 2012 - 11:06 AM
XBL: CATxPARTY
#6
Posted 26 April 2012 - 11:09 AM
#7
Posted 26 April 2012 - 11:10 AM
God damn it, now I feel like a complete moron.
Just lock this...
-- Thrall, Warcraft series
#8
Posted 26 April 2012 - 11:10 AM
SFLUFAN, on 26 April 2012 - 11:09 AM, said:
That's some damn fine trolling.
#13
Posted 26 April 2012 - 12:40 PM
SFLUFAN, on 26 April 2012 - 11:09 AM, said:
Jesus, I hope so.
"The world could use more heathens" -TheGlassPassenger
"Will you... have my sex?" -Kal El
"I make all the men wet." -Niggles
"I would suck the fuck out of that cock" -Giggers
"I like the cock gif" -CNut
#14
Posted 26 April 2012 - 01:51 PM
#15
Posted 26 April 2012 - 02:14 PM
#16
Posted 26 April 2012 - 02:19 PM
ThreePi, on 26 April 2012 - 02:14 PM, said:
Like, I'm pretty sure opening a grave is illegal in America, even if it's not federal law (though oddly enough, as in most of the world, the older the grave is, the more acceptable it is to open it, which I find curious)
#17
Posted 26 April 2012 - 02:20 PM

When is a Republican Keynesian? When they are president and the US is in a recession. Any other time it is "socialism" and "debt" to put people back to work.
http://www.cepr.net/...beat-the-press/
#18
Posted 26 April 2012 - 02:41 PM
Fizzzzle, on 26 April 2012 - 02:19 PM, said:
Like, I'm pretty sure opening a grave is illegal in America, even if it's not federal law (though oddly enough, as in most of the world, the older the grave is, the more acceptable it is to open it, which I find curious)
Desecration is such a dirty word...
#19
Posted 26 April 2012 - 02:42 PM
Fizzzzle, on 26 April 2012 - 02:19 PM, said:
Like, I'm pretty sure opening a grave is illegal in America, even if it's not federal law (though oddly enough, as in most of the world, the older the grave is, the more acceptable it is to open it, which I find curious)
You seem to have done a lot of research in this area....
XBL: CATxPARTY
#20
Posted 26 April 2012 - 02:46 PM
#21
Posted 26 April 2012 - 02:59 PM
#22
Posted 26 April 2012 - 03:04 PM
#23
Posted 26 April 2012 - 03:09 PM
When a person dies, is the corpse now property?
#24
Posted 26 April 2012 - 03:12 PM
SexyAlf, on 26 April 2012 - 03:09 PM, said:
When a person dies, is the corpse now property?
If we were to make a deal out of it, I would think the best way to deal with it would be to make the body property of the deceased. Making it so that if there is an issue, one would decide what to do with their body in their will, like any other possession.
#25
Posted 26 April 2012 - 03:12 PM
#26
Posted 26 April 2012 - 04:00 PM
#27
Posted 26 April 2012 - 04:10 PM

When is a Republican Keynesian? When they are president and the US is in a recession. Any other time it is "socialism" and "debt" to put people back to work.
http://www.cepr.net/...beat-the-press/
#29
Posted 26 April 2012 - 04:15 PM
Me am teh stupid
#30
Posted 26 April 2012 - 05:14 PM
#31
Posted 26 April 2012 - 05:19 PM
#32
Posted 26 April 2012 - 11:23 PM
#33
Posted 26 April 2012 - 11:29 PM
jigs1, on 26 April 2012 - 04:14 PM, said:
Come on man.
lol

When is a Republican Keynesian? When they are president and the US is in a recession. Any other time it is "socialism" and "debt" to put people back to work.
http://www.cepr.net/...beat-the-press/
#34
Posted 27 April 2012 - 02:28 AM
marioandsonic, on 26 April 2012 - 11:10 AM, said:
God damn it, now I feel like a complete moron.
Just lock this...
#35
Posted 27 April 2012 - 06:38 AM
http://reputator.blogspot.com/
"Gamers are impossible to satisfy." - Reggie Fils-Aime
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users















