Jump to content

Steams Antitrust Case Dismissed


SimpleG

Recommended Posts

Another thought…

If this judge considers Valve’s 30% cut nessicary to pay for online services for their users, where does that leave Sony/Nintendo/Microsoft charging on top of that?

 

I’m sure the console manufacturers would still win in court if it ever came to it, for several reasons.  One being they’d say its priced into their consoles.  Perhaps that argument gets a tad weaker after the Deck is out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like how these companies come after the store that's one of the most consumer-friendly in terms of not overcharging you for a bunch of shit and is otherwise fairly standard from the publisher/developer side... but they all seem real keen on not riling up any of the console manufacturers, where they might actually have more of a case since they recoup a bunch of their online infrastructure costs via a completely separate fee taken directly from the end-user. Hell, I don't think Sony even allows you to buy digital copies of games from places like Amazon anymore, or at least buy codes or whatever. They're locking shit down despite their PS4 "hee hee here's how you share games" BS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, crispy4000 said:

Another thought…

If this judge considers Valve’s 30% cut nessicary to pay for online services for their users, where does that leave Sony/Nintendo/Microsoft charging on top of that?

 

I’m sure the console manufacturers would still win in court if it ever came to it, for several reasons.  One being they’d say its priced into their consoles.  Perhaps that argument gets a tad weaker after the Deck is out.

 

That's exactly the argument, though I don't really believe that should work for Nintendo, even if it likely would in court. The argument "we subsidize hardware with our cut of software sales" would easily win. I'm guessing it's the biggest reason nobody is going after them. Steam gets a big target because it holds a near monopoly on a market that existed before them and that they don't control. If Valve went out of business tomorrow, PC gaming would still be a thing. If Sony noped out of console gaming, there won't be another Playstation. It makes going after console manufacturers trickier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Ghost_MH said:

 

That's exactly the argument, though I don't really believe that should work for Nintendo, even if it likely would in court. The argument "we subsidize hardware with our cut of software sales" would easily win. I'm guessing it's the biggest reason nobody is going after them. Steam gets a big target because it holds a near monopoly on a market that existed before them and that they don't control. If Valve went out of business tomorrow, PC gaming would still be a thing. If Sony noped out of console gaming, there won't be another Playstation. It makes going after console manufacturers trickier.


If Sony noped out of console gaming, there would still be plenty of other consoles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...