SFLUFAN

Of course, in order for Valve to implement a "proper" solution, that would require them to actually spend money and hire more human beings which I have no doubt that Gabe will take to...ahahahahaahahahah...no, sorry I can't even complete the rest of that sentence with a straight face. Here is the cheeky Gamasutra headline/article that the op-ed piece references.

Not that any of them would've gone to begin with, but it still goes to show what a thin-skinned dotard this Slavic whore lover is.

Spoken like a true Caucasian, heterosexual male!

Yeah, sure it was "accidental"! I still think I prefer CNN's "Doomsday video"

Alright - time to think

Why do I have a feeling that you're not actually applauding/smiling about the trailer?

Bluehole elaborated on its position to PC Gamer It seems that their main issue is that Epic (from their perspective) appears to have leveraged its position as the engine licensor to implement improvements that they developed with Bluehole within Fortnite: So, there's another issue. We're going to get some technical support [from Epic], and we're going to work with them to make sure Unreal Engine better supports battle royale gameplay which requires 100 people in one session, and now we're starting to have concerns that they're going to develop new features or improve something in the engine to support that battle royale gameplay, and then use it for their own game mode. With the implication that those improved features would solely remain internally within Epic as a game developer and not be made available for UE4 licensees. Bluehole went on to state that they are concerned that their own internal improvements to UE4 could be compromised: We could be afraid when we make new features in the engine by modifying it internally, that is not already available and public, that feature could be leaked, or other things could happen.

"After listening to the growing feedback from our community and reviewing the gameplay for ourselves, we are concerned that Fortnite may be replicating the experience for which PUBG is known."

@Nokt - do I hear $275?

50km away is not "at" the site

And my GPU is an R9 390 Are you or @Nokt willing to go above my $225

I suppose there could be a potential conflict of interest in the sense that Epic is both the engine licensor and a game developer and can therefore "exploit" engine improvements developed for its licensees for its own game development studio.

I'm fairly certain that "clarification" to PC Gamer doesn't help their case at all.

This probably goes a long way to explain the renewed sense of urgency among the Senate GOP for ACA repeal.

The license will not be renewed after expiration on September 30 and Uber has 21 days to appeal the decision. This is the statement from Transport for London:

The chap's mum is still rather annoyed that he's ending the account.

You guys see what I mean about his head size to shoulder width ratio, right?

This should not be viewed as exculpatory for his psychopathic behavior, but it surely didn't help matters any.

@Nokt @maddux4163 - if you guys want to outbid me, be my guest