• Announcements


      D1P 2017 Charity Campaign for The Life You Can Save: $1,515 (as of April 7, 2017)   12/12/2016

      I've decided to extend our charity campaign for The Life You Can Save organizations for the entirety of 2017 so feel free to contribute at any time!  Periodically through the year, I'll have game giveaways for those who have donated to the campaign as a "thank you" for supporting this worthy endeavor!
    • Jason

      Update on the single-device/browser login restriction issue some people are having.   04/04/2017

      4/7/2017 update: Now people who've been affected by this are saying that it went away on its own after about a week. So I dunno, if this would really hugely inconvenience you try to not log in on additional devices/browsers until the 4.2 update that's supposed to hopefully resolve this for good.   original announcement: For a long time now, D1P has been limited to three logins at a time; logging in on a fourth device or browser would log you out everywhere else. Unfortunately, multiple people have been reporting that they've started experiencing being limited to ONE login at a time.   The good news is, Invision Power Services (the company that makes our forum software) is aware of the issue and will be addressing it in version 4.2 of the software, which is the next big update. The bad news is, they announced about a month ago (the beginning of March 2017) that the update will be coming out in "mid 2017", so we probably have at least another couple of months to go before this is resolved.   In the meantime, I apologize to those affected for the inconvenience, and would suggest to everyone else to not log in to additional devices until this is resolved if this is something you don't want to have to have to deal with. I'm still not 100% sure on why it's not affecting everyone and why it didn't hit everyone affected at the same time, but the timing of when the reports of this started here mostly lines up with when I've seen reports of other sites having this issue starting, and I suspect that the problem is trickling in because of people happening to hit a fourth login that logs them out everywhere else, and then proceeding to be limited to one login at a time after that.

      D1Pcast Episode 26: The Retro Show   04/19/2017

      It's time to have that talk with your kids. No not THAT talk, the talk about retro games and how much better things were back in our days! We have @Reputator join us and talk a bit about the Scorpio and some retro PC cards. [email protected] us about console retro gaming and how he just got his Super Mario USA. While @Jason tells us about the day his parents threw out all his retro consoles. A sad day for any gamer. So listen and give us your feed back about your retro gaming experience!    


Supreme High Chancellor
  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Everything posted by SFLUFAN

  1. PC Gamer (review in progress) - "Flawed But Fun" Gamespot - 8 RPS - positive on multiplayer, not-so-positive on campaign Eurogamer (review in progress - full campaign plus some multiplayer) - "Brutal, Beautiful, and Inconsistently Brilliant" IGN (review in progress - campaign only) - "If I had to score it now, based solely on the single-player campaign, I’d give it a 7.2, for good." Destructoid - 7.5 Polygon - 8 PCGamesN - 8 PC Invasion - 7 USGamer - 4/5
  2. The context for this article is the overall effect of the games on the popularity/success of the written works. Sapkowski previously indicated that he sold his rights to the Witcher series for a lump sum payment rather than accept royalties (because he didn't believe that there would be any profits for him to get royalties from).
  3. This essay appears to be very well-researched and thoughtful, so I thought the comics fans on the board should check it out. It's definitely worth throwing a couple of bucks to its creator.
  4. It was an expansion for the first CoD on the PC. Also, I forgot CoD 2: Big Red One! Sent from my XT1080 using Tapatalk
  5. Let's count 'em out: 1. Call of Duty 2. Call of Duty: United Offensive 3. Call of Duty: Finest Hour 4. Call of Duty 2 5. Call of Duty 2: Big Red One 6. Call of Duty 3 7. Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8. Call of Duty: World at War 9. Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 10. Call of Duty: Black Ops 11. Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 12. Call of Duty: Black Ops 2 13. Call of Duty: Ghosts 14. Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 15. Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare 16. Call of Duty: Black Ops 3 17. Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare
  6. This GAF poster has been pretty reliable with CDPR "insider" info in the past. It appears that they've gone back to the drawing board with Cyberpunk 2077 to make it "more ambitious". I guess "2077" will be the release date after all!
  7. Jordan Peterson should be allowed to speak in public again because his theories (as espoused on Sam Harris's podcast) are incomprehensible nonsense. In fact, his tongue should probably be torn out and nailed to a wall as a warning to everyone else!
  8. Har har har
  9. Where did the contractor get hit?
  10. This is going to be a mild spoiler for Dishonored 2. In the course of the game, you have the ability to effectively skip an entire level by solving "The Jindosh Riddle" (this is tied to the Eureka achievement) that I've posted a screenshot of below. Note: the riddle clues are randomized for each playthrough so your riddle will be different than mine, but the overall riddle structure remains the same. Now, I'm not asking how to solve the riddle because I manged to do so...eventually. What gave me a helluva lot of trouble was the following sentence: "Someone else carried a valuable Diamond and when she saw it, the visitor from Fraeport next to her almost spilled her neighbor's rum." Based on that clue, in your estimation, how many people are involved in that particular sequence of events? From the way that clue is written, I was totally convinced that there are three distinct individuals involved: - the person carrying the diamond - the visitor from Fraeport - the neighbor with the rum Using the logic matrix that I created to solve the riddle, I kept getting a contradiction whenever I entered the positive relationships. Of course, it was only when I said "to hell with it" and changed my assumption to that the contradiction resolved and I was able to solve the riddle. I maintain that that particular part of the riddle is poorly written!
  11. This revelation came during the ongoing custody trial.
  12. Aaaaaand that's a wrap on this for the time being:
  13. Hmmm...I do have some short positions that could use a bit of help